|
 It was appropriate to dismiss the New Jersey claim for domestic violence. There was no mention in the complaint of allegedly harassing telephone calls and no evidence they occurred.
E.B. v. W.G.C., New Jersey App. Div., June 30, 2010
 The motion to terminate alimony due to changed circumstances was properly denied by the New Jersey divorce judge. The ex-husband failed to establish that he lacked the financial resources to continue to support the ex-wife.
Cabrera v. Cabrera, New Jersey App. Div. June 25, 2010
 The father's motion to disqualify a New Jersey court-appointed expert regarding parenting time and appoint a new expert was properly denied. He presented no facts showing that the expert is biased or legal arguments showing an abuse of discretion in the court's reappointment.
Ismail v. Aboubakr, New Jersey App. Div., June 18, 2010
 Under their New Jersey divorce agreement, she was to pay him alimony. But she didn't and within 6 months of the New Jersey divorce, she tried to have the court vacate the alimony. "The trial court correctly found that she set forth no facts to support her claim for relief. Under the circumstances, no plenary hearing was necessary for the trial court to conclude that the motion for reformation should be denied."
Nisbett v. Nisbett, New Jersey App. Div., June 14, 2010
 The father failed in his attempt to emancipate his 22-year old daughter and thereby terminate his payment of child support, as well as college expenses.
Stickle v. Stickle, New Jersey App. Div., June 11, 2010
 The New Jersey divorce judge may have erred in calculating child support, by using the federal income tax definition of adjusted gross income rather than adjusted gross taxable income as directed by the New Jersey Child Support Guidelines.
Friedman v. Friedman, nka Frank, New Jersey App. Div., June 10, 2010
 Although the New Jersey divorce judge was correct in ruling the ex-wife had waived her right to the disability retirement pension, she was entitled to share in the ordinary retirement pension.
Bunalski v. Bunalski, New Jersey App. Div. June 9, 2010
 "On appeal, defendant maintains that the trial court rulings resulted in a windfall to plaintiff because she received both the $75,000 lump sum payment in lieu of alimony plus $300 a week in alimony after the agreement was reached contrary to the provisions of the final agreement of the parties. We agree."
Cole v. Cole, New Jersey App. Div., June 8, 2010
 Under New Jersey family law, once a child is emancipated and child support has been terminated, can that child become "unemancipated", thereby reviving the child support obligation?
Dehere v. Booker, New Jersey App. Div., June 7, 2010
 Is it time for New Jersey divorce alimony guidelines? Maybe : it's being seriously considered across the river in New York : "...a standard formula that judges would need to use to determine support payments... Though judges would still have discretion to modify those awards, backers said that the provision would take much of the uncertainty out of divorce proceedings, where a patchwork of case law has resulted in widely inconsistent awards."
The New York Times, June 4, 2010
|
|
